Before the Iraq war, and during, I held the position that an invasion of Iraq would be justified if it were mainly to aid an indigenous uprising, rather than imposing a new regime from the top down. In Libya, the West seems to have an opportunity to do just that. This seems to be an ideal situation to take action in support of pro-democracy factions fighting to prevent their own slaughter.
Chomsky disagrees in this interview.
What surprised me was his assertion that the overall attitude of the pro-democracy population was that the West has been "mostly asked to stay away". This seems to contrast with this New York Times article that describes the reaction to the UN resolution to impose a no-fly zone over Libya: "Benghazi erupted in celebration at news of the resolution’s passage. 'We are embracing each other,' said Imam Bugaighis, spokeswoman for the rebel council in Benghazi. 'The people are euphoric. Although a bit late, the international society did not let us down.'"
The Arab League also seems to be in favor of a no-fly zone
Maybe there's a distinction to be made between the West and "the international society" but, given that right now it looks like operations will mainly be carried out by Britain and France, that distinction isn't very clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment